I’m shocked to see it has been a month since the last time I
posted. Nothing was wrong during that time, just my life got very busy for a
while. I’ve noticed that the busier I am, the less I exercise. That bothers me.
I’ve also noticed that the busier I am, the more I want to snack at night. That
bothers me too. You certainly know this equation: less exercise + more snacking
= snug pants.
The usual explanation for this turn of events is that when you
get busy, you don’t exercise because you don’t think you have enough time, you
get more stressed because you’re not exercising enough, and – viola! – you start
eating for emotional reasons. There’s some truth to this. It’s harder to resist
the siren call of certain foods (chocolate!) when you’re worn out trying to compete
in the Multi-tasking Olympics that is our modern lifestyle. Besides, who wouldn’t
enjoy a tasty treat at the end of a long, frustrating day?
Yet, I have to confess that I find this whole concept of
emotional eating a bit disturbing. I know I've talked about this before, but it bears repeating. It’s not that I don’t think emotions play a
role, but that the role of emotions gets disproportional coverage whenever the subject
of obesity comes up. If you believe the mainstream media, especially magazines
and talk shows aimed at women, it often seems that our national weight problem
is mainly due to the inability of overweight people to get a grip. If only the
weight-challenged could “heal” the emotional wounds that cause them to overeat,
they would effortlessly lose the extra pounds and life would be just peachy.
This seems so simplistic to me. It’s also a case of blame
the victim that ignores the contribution of the environment. How the food
culture in this country promotes fatty, sugary, salty eating as normal. The way
the food industry routinely churns out new products that are expressly designed
to be irresistible to human taste buds. The tremendous social pressure to overeat
in certain ways at certain times. Think mashed potatoes and pumpkin pie at
Thanksgiving. Barbeque and ice cream in the summer. Christmas cookies. Endless Christmas cookies.
The focus on emotions also allows the inadequate response of
the medical and insurance community to be quietly ignored. I often wonder why my
health insurance will not cover nutritional counseling for a person (like me) who
has struggled with morbid obesity for most of her life. But if it’s my fault
because I’m “too emotional,” well then, better to rearrange my digestive system
than try to reconstruct the fragile mess in my head. This focus on my individual
failing also keeps me from asking why the American Medical Association doesn’t
condemn US farm subsidy policy that favors the production of corn (for
high-fructose corn syrup) and sugarcane over fresh fruits and vegetables.
So yes, I’ve been eating more because I’m under stress right
now. And yes, it’s an emotional reaction. I could delve deep into my psyche and
figure out what wounds I’m trying to heal with chocolate, but I prefer a more
direct approach: I don’t keep foods I can’t resist in the house. It works every
time and it don’t cost a dime.
I’m getting teary-eyed just thinking about it.
I had been wondering about you, glad you posted
ReplyDeleteI was wondering about me too! :-)
DeleteI just watched a long, very medical/technical video by a doctor at UCSF about the evils of sugar/HFCS. He says it is a toxin, and related how we put limits on alcohol because it is a toxin (indicating that the government should put controls on HFCS, I think.) That was the first time that government intervention made sense to me.
ReplyDeleteIn the meantime, I was pretty happy, in reviewing the foods that I keep in my house, that sugar/HFCS are minimally available.